<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Twitter&#8217;s new follower limit limit its growth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/</link>
	<description>Web producer, writer, online media cultist. That&#039;s how I roll.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:52:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>Well, one of the dirty little secrets of these services is that many people add friends in the hope that they&#039;ll get a decent percent to follow back. The line between what is legit and what is spam can actually be a murky one. My feeling is that setting a cap can be arbitrary and may chase away some legit members of the service. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This brings up other issues that I&#039;d like to get into at some point. What is appropriate / normal / expected in keeping up with the profiles you follow on these services? For example, for a while I read every tweet of every person I followed on Twitter, sometimes reading through 10 or more pages to catch up on what I missed over night. Is this normal? All I know is that there&#039;s no way I can possibly do that anymore !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one of the dirty little secrets of these services is that many people add friends in the hope that they&#39;ll get a decent percent to follow back. The line between what is legit and what is spam can actually be a murky one. My feeling is that setting a cap can be arbitrary and may chase away some legit members of the service. </p>
<p>This brings up other issues that I&#39;d like to get into at some point. What is appropriate / normal / expected in keeping up with the profiles you follow on these services? For example, for a while I read every tweet of every person I followed on Twitter, sometimes reading through 10 or more pages to catch up on what I missed over night. Is this normal? All I know is that there&#39;s no way I can possibly do that anymore !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>If each of those 2000 accounts updates several times a day, how  could you possibly keep up with the stream of updates? Even if half were largely quiet?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW: If you had some legitimate use for following so many others, you could create several accounts and merge them together with a client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If each of those 2000 accounts updates several times a day, how  could you possibly keep up with the stream of updates? Even if half were largely quiet?</p>
<p>BTW: If you had some legitimate use for following so many others, you could create several accounts and merge them together with a client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Spammers will need to be contended with on any platform. I was trying to illustrate that capping followers at 2k won&#039;t necessarily prevent spamming on Twitter and could move legitimate services/self-promoters elsewhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spammers will need to be contended with on any platform. I was trying to illustrate that capping followers at 2k won&#39;t necessarily prevent spamming on Twitter and could move legitimate services/self-promoters elsewhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zota</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>zota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/12/will-twitters-new-follower-limit-limit-its-growth/#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>So spammers will leave Twitter for FriendFeed and Facebook... and that&#039;s bad for Twitter?  I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So spammers will leave Twitter for FriendFeed and Facebook&#8230; and that&#39;s bad for Twitter?  I&#39;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
