<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and FriendFeed: where the future may tread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/</link>
	<description>Web producer, writer, online media cultist. That&#039;s how I roll.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:46:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Berlin</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a good way of thinking of the two Reilly, they&#039;re different kinds of &quot;lifestream services.&quot; The great thing about both is that you have the ability to customize them to use in ways that work best for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#39;s a good way of thinking of the two Reilly, they&#39;re different kinds of &#8220;lifestream services.&#8221; The great thing about both is that you have the ability to customize them to use in ways that work best for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reilly</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/07/07/twitter-and-friendfeed-where-the-future-may-tread/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why people think these are similar companies -- they&#039;re not. Twitter is a one-faceted stream of your life; FriendFeed is typically greater than one (often about five or six). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, though -- if Twitter can solve its issues it will be on its way to attract more users. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s very early days for this end of the market, even though the Scobles of the world make us feel like we&#039;re in the midst of a completely mature market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know why people think these are similar companies &#8212; they&#39;re not. Twitter is a one-faceted stream of your life; FriendFeed is typically greater than one (often about five or six). </p>
<p>I agree, though &#8212; if Twitter can solve its issues it will be on its way to attract more users. </p>
<p>It&#39;s very early days for this end of the market, even though the Scobles of the world make us feel like we&#39;re in the midst of a completely mature market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
