<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Web 3.0 Definition Counter-Revolution Begins In Earnest</title>
	<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2007/10/04/the-web-30-definition-counter-revolution-begins-in-earnest/</link>
	<description>Web producer. Writer. Online Media Cultist.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SpragueD</title>
		<link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2007/10/04/the-web-30-definition-counter-revolution-begins-in-earnest/#comment-2187</link>
		<author>SpragueD</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2007/10/04/the-web-30-definition-counter-revolution-begins-in-earnest/#comment-2187</guid>
					<description>Eric,

You have to have a revolution first for their to be a counter-revolution. All I saw in Calacanis' statement was a jargon-laced banality about web use. Try re-reading the core of it with the jargon stripped out:

"[The web] is defined as the creation of high-quality content and services produced by gifted individuals using [web] technology as an enabling platform."

To paraphrase Gertrue Stein, "there is no 'there' there." I think he acknowledges as much and hints at his self-serving intention with all this in this pithy post:

http://www.calacanis.com/2007/10/04/its-cant-be-this-easy-can-it/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>You have to have a revolution first for their to be a counter-revolution. All I saw in Calacanis&#8217; statement was a jargon-laced banality about web use. Try re-reading the core of it with the jargon stripped out:</p>
<p>&#8220;[The web] is defined as the creation of high-quality content and services produced by gifted individuals using [web] technology as an enabling platform.&#8221;</p>
<p>To paraphrase Gertrue Stein, &#8220;there is no &#8216;there&#8217; there.&#8221; I think he acknowledges as much and hints at his self-serving intention with all this in this pithy post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2007/10/04/its-cant-be-this-easy-can-it/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calacanis.com/2007/10/04/its-cant-be-this-easy-can-it/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
