Digg and the Complications of the Social News Model
When the community is allowed to run the show, it’s difficult to know where and when to place limits on that power.
Digg, the most popular social news site (users submit stories and vote, and the most popular get elevated to the site front page), is at the forefront of figuring out the fine points of this still new news model, often in the midst of close scrutiny and even withering criticism from the community itself!
So it is with the case of The Numbers, which sounds kind of mysterious, almost out of Hurley’s back story on Lost. The long story short: someone posted a story to Digg that contained a decryption code that can illegally “crack open” HD-DVDs and therefore allow them to be copied and distributed. The story made the front page of Digg, was somewhere in the timeline pulled down after a cease and desist letter was issued, and was eventually allowed to be reinstated after heavy pressure from the Digg community. In the meantime, a flood of related stories – many of which contained the very same decryption code – basically took over Digg yesterday.
The reaction today throughout the blogosphere is varied, loud, and passionate. Digg founder Kevin Rose boils down Digg’s decision to reverse its policy of deleting stories with the code to giving the community what it wants. He writes, “You’d rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won’t delete stories or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the consequences might be.” This overturns Digg CEO Jay Adelson’s earlier statement that “in order for Digg to survive, it must abide by the law.”
Much like a benchmark Supreme Court decision, Digg’s handling of this case will set the stage for future situations for all community-driven websites. Does the voice of the community outweigh the right of site owners to “survive,” as Adelson put it? Where does democratic rule end and business rules take over?
Mashable answers in part by stating that Digg “may just tolerate the community’s behavior - what choice do they have?” MG Siegler agrees in a piece called “Kevin Rose Raises the White Flag,” writing that “It is a smart move. It is also quite literally the only thing they could have done to try and alleviate the situation with the Digg users.”
GigaOM analyzes “nerd anarchy” and “the greatest crisis” of Digg’s life, and then opens up the debate by drawing in the ongoing YouTube/Viacom feud.
And Jason at Webomatica issues a warning to corporations that once a meme goes public, it ain’t getting shoved back into the closet.
Recent Entries
- A Posterous post
- Shake it up
- The end of Internet censorship?
- First came the microstartups, then came the micro VCs
- #CNNFail, Iran, Twitter, and Sunday morning
- China and the webs
- Scientology and contextual advertising
- All the little things
- Congrats to Darren Rowse and ProBlogger: 5,000 posts strong
- Treasure trove for fans of The Wire
May 2nd, 2007 at 5:38 pm
It is important to note that not all diggers reacted with the same teenage basement mutiny mentality:
http://www.paydayloanaffiliate.com/blog/DiggersVsDigg.aspx
May 2nd, 2007 at 7:08 pm
Well, Joe, your opinion is understandable, if only because you have sold your soul to the kind of bloodsucking parasitism driving forward the exponential rise in working class debt through the predatory lending practices known as “payday loans” and you are also actively working to render the Web utterly useless through the deception techniques misleadingly mislabeled as “Search Engine Optimization.”
Given your business endeavors, naturally you’d sympathize with the MPAA’s and RIAA’s attempts to maintain artificial scarcity, cheat artists, and drive popular tastes ever deeper into the gutter, while generating limitless profits for corporate middle managers who never actually produce anything themselves.
But I suppose you are entitled to your completely wrongheaded and shortsighted opinions, even if their necessary consequences involve the relentless increase of human misery, and in any sane and rational future their every last detail is doomed to the refuse heap of history.
(It’s a good thing I paused before sending this comment. I was tempted to respond harshly.)
May 8th, 2007 at 11:32 am
4640a6bacb
4640a6bacb
May 19th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Gratis poker bonus
Gratis poker bonus
May 20th, 2007 at 6:23 pm
New casino no deposit bonus code
New casino no deposit bonus code
May 21st, 2007 at 7:02 am
No deposit casino bonus coupon code
No deposit casino bonus coupon code
May 21st, 2007 at 7:16 am
No deposit casino cash bonus
No deposit casino cash bonus
May 21st, 2007 at 9:44 am
Instant casino bonus
Instant casino bonus
May 21st, 2007 at 4:58 pm
How to play craps and win
How to play craps and win
May 21st, 2007 at 5:06 pm
Platinum play flash casino
Platinum play flash casino
May 21st, 2007 at 6:02 pm
Free casino slot - play now!
Free casino slot - play now!
May 21st, 2007 at 6:28 pm
Platinum play casino
Platinum play casino
May 25th, 2007 at 9:52 am
Get online casino bonus cash
Get online casino bonus cash
May 25th, 2007 at 10:02 am
Carnival casino bonus
Carnival casino bonus
May 25th, 2007 at 10:10 am
Diamond club casino bonus
Diamond club casino bonus
June 13th, 2007 at 10:23 am
Bonus casino coupon online
Bonus casino coupon online
June 30th, 2007 at 2:52 am
No deposit online casino cash bonus
No deposit online casino cash bonus
July 7th, 2007 at 12:34 am
4edd14026e084a8eb9121c7c06043a1f
4edd14026e084a8eb9121c7c06043a1f
November 28th, 2007 at 10:58 pm
backseat bangers backseatbangers
hottest backseat bangers backseatbangers
March 23rd, 2009 at 6:32 am
[...] of our writer’s just wrote about the story last [...]